The reason for me to employ English language while addressing to one¡Çs nonsensical comments is to ensure fairness.

By now, I am totally convinced that Canlolwery is incapable of employing logic while responding to my statements. At the same time, her sentence structure and command of language, quoting from my GP teacher, ¡Èis simply appalling¡É, even when the language she uses is mandarin, her mother tongue.

And since my English is appalling in the same way, with little logic threading the sentences together, by using English, I hope we can be put on the same starting line.

Sort of.

¡ÚÀÞáÈ¡Û

Canlolwery. I am well aware that she no longer uses this pseudonym, but I think it is more appropriate for me to refer to her as such, since this is the name that she used when we met.

Although I am in full support of elitism, idiots are not the ones that cause my disgust. It is those people who realize their idiotism, yet refuse to do anything to change their states. In other words, people who enjoy being idiots. My vocabulary is limited. The only word in my word bank to describe such people is shameless.
In responds to my arguments, Canlolwery did not counter argue most of my claims, which I suppose is due to her incapability of finding any lope hole at all. Instead, she had taken the strategy to admit all the statement against her, so as to create the illusion that the problems that I mentioned is not of importance. For example, she had admitted that she is immature and has a low culture literacy level for several times.

She is suffering from over confidence as well. It may sound like a conflict, realizing ones own idiotism yet in posses of over confidence. If you ever have the chance to encounter a typical ¡Èpost90s¡É of China, and be unfortunate enough to start a conversation with him or her, then you will realize that being conflicting is one of the distinctive feature of this batch of Chinese. For example, my mandarin is far too advance for her. This can be shown from the fact that I pointed out numerous mistakes in her passage, and gave suggestions for her to make it right. However, in her reply, she refuse to admit committing any mistake, although she gave no explanation or evidence to show that I was wrong. Instead, she chose to question my command of language. Her sole supporting argument is that I have living overseas for nearly a decade, thus there is no way for my mandarin to be better than that of one who never left China. While all are able to see the logical fallacy, she think her argument is near perfect.

She is having difficulty in thinking logically. Evidence fills her comments, so interested people please go and entertain yourself. For the benefit of those who read English only, I shall give some examples. I pointed out that Canlolwery changes lover at a rate too rapid for her age. She argued that if the lovers that I had referred to is A,B and C, then I am totally wrong as she only treated them as friends. Later on in the same passage, while trying to prove that I know nothing about relationship, she took the example of herself. She truly loved A,B and C, and wanted to be man and wife with A and B¡Ä.

Yea¡Ä. I have more to say, but my poor vocabulary is not allowing that to happen, so I shall stop here.

Ok. The above paragraphs cost me 100 brain cells.
But I predict it will cost Canlolwery several times more brain cells, if she has the will to figure out what I am talking about. I have just tried the google translation tool, converting the whole article into Chinese. The result is worst than that of Canlolwery¡Çs language. It can¡Çt even get my basic idea right¡Ä so flip dictionary, you dodo.

Canlolwery. I am well aware that she no longer uses this pseudonym, but I think it is more appropriate for me to refer to her as such, since this is the name that she used when we met.

Although I am in full support of elitism, idiots are not the ones that cause my disgust. It is those people who realize their idiotism, yet refuse to do anything to change their states. In other words, people who enjoy being idiots. My vocabulary is limited. The only word in my word bank to describe such people is shameless.
In responds to my arguments, Canlolwery did not counter argue most of my claims, which I suppose is due to her incapability of finding any lope hole at all. Instead, she had taken the strategy to admit all the statement against her, so as to create the illusion that the problems that I mentioned is not of importance. For example, she had admitted that she is immature and has a low culture literacy level for several times.

She is suffering from over confidence as well. It may sound like a conflict, realizing ones own idiotism yet in posses of over confidence. If you ever have the chance to encounter a typical ¡Èpost90s¡É of China, and be unfortunate enough to start a conversation with him or her, then you will realize that being conflicting is one of the distinctive feature of this batch of Chinese. For example, my mandarin is far too advance for her. This can be shown from the fact that I pointed out numerous mistakes in her passage, and gave suggestions for her to make it right. However, in her reply, she refuse to admit committing any mistake, although she gave no explanation or evidence to show that I was wrong. Instead, she chose to question my command of language. Her sole supporting argument is that I have living overseas for nearly a decade, thus there is no way for my mandarin to be better than that of one who never left China. While all are able to see the logical fallacy, she think her argument is near perfect.

She is having difficulty in thinking logically. Evidence fills her comments, so interested people please go and entertain yourself. For the benefit of those who read English only, I shall give some examples. I pointed out that Canlolwery changes lover at a rate too rapid for her age. She argued that if the lovers that I had referred to is A,B and C, then I am totally wrong as she only treated them as friends. Later on in the same passage, while trying to prove that I know nothing about relationship, she took the example of herself. She truly loved A,B and C, and wanted to be man and wife with A and B¡Ä.

Yea¡Ä. I have more to say, but my poor vocabulary is not allowing that to happen, so I shall stop here.

Ok. The above paragraphs cost me 100 brain cells.
But I predict it will cost Canlolwery several times more brain cells, if she has the will to figure out what I am talking about. I have just tried the google translation tool, converting the whole article into Chinese. The result is worst than that of Canlolwery¡Çs language. It can¡Çt even get my basic idea right¡Ä so flip dictionary, you dodo.